Home Page
Progressive News
Health Care & Wellness
Media & The Blogs
National Issues
Candidates & Causes
Poverty & Economics
Environment & Science
Education & Opportunity
Equality Rights & Issues
International Issues
Rants & Raves

About us
Who We Are
Community Guidelines
Getting Started
Formatting Tips
FAQ
Contact Us


New Blogroll coming soon

Progressive Issues for "more and BETTER" Democrats
"Health care is a fundamental right." (Ted Kennedy, 8/26/08)
* * * * * * *

Problems In Garland County

by: Michael Conrad

Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 22:44:26 PM EDT


Garland County Election Commission Charles Tapp made a unilateral decision to close 40 polling places and leave only 2 open.  This looks like it could end up being decisive.

Garland County results three weeks ago:

Bill Halter - 44%
Blanche Lincoln - 40%
D.C. Morrison - 15%

Tonight (via POLITICO's map):

Blanche Lincoln - 50.3%
Bill Halter - 49.7%

Jed Lewison has more.

UPDATE:  Two very big "if"s, but if Lincoln ends up narrowly winning, and there's good reason to believe Garland County was decisive, the Democratic establishment is going to have a huge problem on its hands, to say the least.

The more I read about Garland County the worse the situation looks.  Now maybe it just looks that way, but it's hard to see how a reduction in polling places this drastic isn't going to effect the results.   Frankly, this episode is strange no matter what the result is.   Can we get a clean winner here?

UPDATE #2:  Apparently Garland County turnout was down by 40%. The question now is whether Garland is going to be decisive.

UPDATE #3:  POLITICO calls it for Lincoln.

UPDATE #4:  So does the AP.

If Lincoln won straight up, that's a really bad outcome in my mind, but not a controversy.  But if Garland was decisive...

UPDATE #5:  With 98% of precincts reporting, Lincoln is ahead by 10,000 votes. Unless there are errors in the count, it was Bill Clinton and Pulaski County (home to Little Rock) that won this for Blanche Lincoln. Political Wire has a good overview of the importance of Pulaski.  

(I'd still like to know what Charles Tapp was thinking, though.)  

This result is a real disappointment, but primaries still matter, and I still firmly believe this was worth it.  K Street Dems like Blanche Lincoln are a real drag on the party.  Challenging them is necessary.  This was a close race.  And Bill Clinton only has one home state.

Ned Lamont beat Joe Lieberman in the 06' CT primary.
Joe Sestak beat Arlen Specter in the 10' PA primary.
Blanche Lincoln beat Bill Halter in the 10' AR primary with a big assist from Bill Clinton and President Obama (plus slimy ads and a lack of polling places in Garland County), but it was close.

This is cause for disappointment, but not cause for despair.

Related: Smart takes from Greg Sargent and Chris Bowers.

Michael Conrad :: Problems In Garland County
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
FU Charles Tapp (3.00 / 3)
There should of been more noise made about this rather than a vain, "we'll just try harder to get out the vote" effort.

Fuck!



Voters were not allowed to early vote on Saturday either because of a AR statute (3.00 / 3)




[ Parent ]
Yeah (3.00 / 3)
I thought there was too much light on this for it to go down like this, but it looks like I was dead wrong.

Now I want to know if it's decisive.  Because if it is, this is a huge problem.

Bill Clinton has the Senate primary reverse - Midas touch.

First the Coakley debacle and then this.  

If calls get too loud for a remedy, I wouldn't be surprised if he tries to everyone down.

One huge problem:  Bill wanted Hillary to accuse then Senator Obama of stealing the Iowa Caucus, even though there was no evidence for that at all and the margin was massive.

I'm going to get some coffee and then I'll be back to see if there are answers to my Garland questions.  Namely, was this the difference?

Colbert Nation Gulf of America Fund


[ Parent ]
3 Garland County voters filed suit earlier today citing... (3.00 / 3)
voter disenfranchisement due to the 41 polling places 3 weeks ago to 2 today...

and apparently, the county was supposed to send out mailers 15 days ago to Garland County voters stating the change... they did not...

so i'm hoping this is contested a bit...

we're gonna lose the seat this fall for sure with Lincoln in there...

--poligirl  :D

(-5.75,-4.92) "Compromise sounds a lot like capitulation, doesn't it?" --Elizabeth Edwards


Something is rotten in the state of Arkansas (3.00 / 4)


Abstinence programs breed hypocrites.

This probably explains it, but I still need to see the raw data (3.00 / 2)
That Pulanski county political wire article was from the earlier primary which does show it's probably true about Pulanski county, but I need to know the exact margins, because that is still BS when it comes to Garland county and Charles Tapp. Even if Halter would of lost by less, I want to know how much less.

There was also Ouachita County:

9:31 p.m.: Markos is  nervous:

   THIS is genuinely worrisome -- Halter won Ouachita County narrowly three weeks ago, 43-42-15. Right now, with 40% in, Lincoln is winning it 56-44.


That is a good take by Chris Bowers and Greg Sargent.

Oh and STFU Rahm, you corporate piece of shit. I want to flush you down the toilet. Obama needs to put a muzzle on his dog or labor will seriously send both of them home packing as they sit out for them.



Exactly (3.00 / 2)
Frankly, if there was reason to believe Lincoln had lost votes in a similar fashion I would want to get to the bottom of it as well.

Whoever the White House official who attacked labor is has their head firmly shoved up their own ass.

If they think "re - elect House Blue Dogs" appeals to people outside of DC, they are beyond clueless.  No good is going to come of these "effin' retarded" moments.  In fact, in both 2010 and 2012, a faction of the White House seems determined to be their own worst enemy.

You know what else would save a lot of seats?  Not royally screwing up economic recovery.  

Colbert Nation Gulf of America Fund


[ Parent ]
shit shit shit shit shit (3.00 / 2)
 SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Still too close to call for the Props in California... (3.00 / 2)
with only 23.5% reporting. and me with no nails left to bite!

Now with 50.8% of precincts reporting... (3.00 / 2)
Prop 16 is losing! Thank goodness for a little good news tonight.

Prop 17, (the Mercury Insurance measure) has been winning all night but its starting to loose ground...that's good!

Prop 15, Fair Elections Act is loosing and that's unfortunate.


Voters sue in Garland County over polling places (3.00 / 1)
http://www.wxvt.com/Global/sto...

Halter didn't win the county like he did last time.

Glad they are suing.



And finally... (3.00 / 1)

with almost 70% of precincts reporting;

I'm going to call this one,

Prop 16 has lost

and 17 is losing as well.

I'm signing off, although I probably won't/can't sleep for awhile.


Front Page Feed:
Menu
New here?
Make a New Account

Have an account?
Log in:

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


A stirring tale of how progressives built America and lessons on creating the next Big Change Moment, from OpenLeft's Mike Lux.

"As inspiring as it is informative." -Arianna Huffington

"Mike is that rarest breed: a populist insider." -Wes Boyd

"Better than an OpenLeft flame war." -Chris Bowers

Search




Advanced Search
Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Progressive Blue
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Since 02/29/2008
Powered by: SoapBlox