Home Page
Progressive News
Health Care & Wellness
Media & The Blogs
National Issues
Candidates & Causes
Poverty & Economics
Environment & Science
Education & Opportunity
Equality Rights & Issues
International Issues
Rants & Raves

About us
Who We Are
Community Guidelines
Getting Started
Formatting Tips
FAQ
Contact Us


New Blogroll coming soon

Progressive Issues for "more and BETTER" Democrats
"Health care is a fundamental right." (Ted Kennedy, 8/26/08)
* * * * * * *

House Populists pushing Wall Street transaction fee bill

by: desmoinesdem

Sat Dec 05, 2009 at 00:03:17 AM EST


( - promoted by Michael Conrad)

Members of the House Populist Caucus, chaired by Representative Bruce Braley (IA-01), held a press conference on Thursday to endorse a bill that would "assess a small fee on Wall Street day traders to pay down the national deficit and invest in America's middle class families."

Details about the bill are after the jump.

desmoinesdem :: House Populists pushing Wall Street transaction fee bill
From a press release Braley's office issued on December 3:

"One of the founding principles of the Populist Caucus is to fight for working families by creating and retaining good paying jobs," Braley said. "For the past eight years, our economic policies have put the interests of Wall Street ahead of the interests of  Main Street Americans. The reasons we introduced the Wall Street transaction tax today is because we need to get our economy working again for Middle Class families.  That's who we're fighting for every day and that is who our federal government should be fighting for."

"Our nation continues to be crippled by a struggling economy which has resulted in an astronomical unemployment rate of 10.2 percent," [Representative Peter] DeFazio [OR-04] said.  "The American taxpayers bailed out Wall Street during a crisis brought on by reckless speculation in the financial markets.  This legislation will force Wall Street to do their part and put people displaced by that crisis back to work." [...]

The legislation will assess a small securities fee on the following transactions:
·         Stock transactions (tax rate will be 1/4 of 1 percent--0.25%),
·         Futures contracts to buy or sell a specified commodity of standardized quality at a certain date in the future, at a market determined price (tax rate will be 0.02%),
·         Swaps between two firms on certain benefits of one party's financial instrument for those of the other party's financial instrument (tax rate will be 0.02%)
·         Credit default swaps where a contract is swapped through a series of payments in exchange for a payoff if a credit instrument (typically a bond or loan) goes into default (fails to pay) (tax rate will be 0.02%),
·         And options, which are contracts between a buyer and a seller that gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to buy or to sell a particular asset on or before the option's expiration time, at an agreed price (at the rate of the underlying asset).

To ensure the tax is appropriately targeted to speculators and has no impact on the average investor and pension funds, the tax will be refunded for:

1)      tax-favored retirement accounts,
2)      education savings accounts,
3)      health savings accounts,
4)      mutual funds and,
5)      the first $100,000 of transactions annually that are not already exempted.

Braley spokeswoman Caitlin Legacki told me that as of Friday morning, the bill has 21 co-sponsors, 14 of whom belong to the Populist Caucus.

The bill has at least one champion in the Senate. HELP Committee Chairman Tom Harkin appeared with Populist Caucus members at yesterday's press conference. I don't know whether any Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee is willing to push for this measure.

I haven't seen any reaction yet from the Obama administration. Supporting this bill should be an easy call, but my hunch is that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and senior presidential adviser Larry Summers will have Wall Street's back on this one. Here's hoping I am wrong about that.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
rec'd but I do not favor health savings accounts (3.00 / 2)
...for a myriad of reasons...

this bill has no bearing (3.00 / 1)
on whether those exist. I understand your position, but I think it's wise to exempt those accounts from these fees.

Join the Iowa progressive community at  Bleeding Heartland.  

[ Parent ]
It's about time the U.S caught up with the U.K here (3.00 / 2)
James Tobin would be proud and it's about time we listened to his Keynesian common sense.

You always have worthwhile diaries, desmoinesdem, and it's good to see the Populist caucus acting on it on what's really a no brainer.

Thank you.



I love how naysayers claim (3.00 / 1)
the New York Stock Exchange would be devastated by this tax, as investment capital would flow abroad. The City seems to be doing quite well in London.

Join the Iowa progressive community at  Bleeding Heartland.  

[ Parent ]
Exactly. What a ridiculous claim nt (0.00 / 0)




[ Parent ]
Front Page Feed:
Menu
New here?
Make a New Account

Have an account?
Log in:

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


A stirring tale of how progressives built America and lessons on creating the next Big Change Moment, from OpenLeft's Mike Lux.

"As inspiring as it is informative." -Arianna Huffington

"Mike is that rarest breed: a populist insider." -Wes Boyd

"Better than an OpenLeft flame war." -Chris Bowers

Search




Advanced Search
Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Progressive Blue
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Since 02/29/2008
Powered by: SoapBlox