Home Page
Progressive News
Health Care & Wellness
Media & The Blogs
National Issues
Candidates & Causes
Poverty & Economics
Environment & Science
Education & Opportunity
Equality Rights & Issues
International Issues
Rants & Raves

About us
Who We Are
Community Guidelines
Getting Started
Formatting Tips
FAQ
Contact Us


New Blogroll coming soon

Progressive Issues for "more and BETTER" Democrats
"Health care is a fundamental right." (Ted Kennedy, 8/26/08)
* * * * * * *
Support Rescue/Rebuliding in Haiti
Red Cross | CARE | Doctors Without Borders
YELE | International Rescue Committee | Partners in Health


What's unfair to residents of coal-dependent states?

by: desmoinesdem

Sun Nov 22, 2009 at 23:35:52 PM EST


( - promoted by Michael Conrad)

Politicians in both parties have complained that proposed federal climate change bills are "unfair" to Midwestern states, which rely largely on coal to generate electricity. Utility companies and corporate groups have tried to reinvent themselves as defenders of the public interest against those who would unjustly "punish" consumers living in coal-dependent states.

Physicians for Social Responsibility released a report last week on "Coal's Assault on Human Health." This report should be required reading for all members of Congress, especially Senator Tom Harkin and other Democrats who have demanded more subsidies for coal-burning utilities in the climate-change bill. From the executive summary (pdf file):

Coal pollutants affect all major body organ systems and contribute to four of the five leading causes of mortality in the U.S.: heart disease, cancer, stroke and chronic lower respiratory diseases. [...] Each step of the coal lifecycle--mining, transportation, washing, combustion, and disposing of post-combustion wastes--impacts human health. Coal combustion in particular contributes to diseases affecting large portions of the U.S. population, including asthma, lung cancer, heart disease, and stroke, compounding the major public health challenges of our time. It interferes with lung development, increases the risk of heart attacks, and compromises intellectual capacity.

In the Des Moines Register, Lee Rood highlighted some of the extra burdens Iowans bear because of coal-fired power plants. Several other nearby states, such as Missouri and Indiana, are even more dependent on coal for their electricity.

desmoinesdem :: What's unfair to residents of coal-dependent states?
Over the past year, Iowa Independent has published many outstanding reports on coal ash disposal. I recommend reading the latest piece by Jason Hancock: "Effects of coal ash contamination go beyond health risks."

It's clear that coal-fired power plants extract a huge toll on public health. Creating financial incentives to move away from coal as a source of electricity isn't "unfair," especially since low-income Americans could receive increased subsidies for utility bills.

What's unfair is for corporations and politicians to fight for the status quo, without regard for Americans who die prematurely or suffer from preventable health problems because of coal.

In one blog post I can't do justice to the extensively documented report by Physicians for Social Responsibility, but here's one more excerpt from the executive summary (pdf file):

A nationwide study of blood samples in 1999-2000 showed that 15.7% of women of childbearing age have blood mercury levels that would cause them to give birth to children with mercury levels exceeding the EPA's maximum acceptable dose for mercury. This dose was established to limit the number of children with mercury-related neurological and developmental impairments. Researchers have estimated that between 317,000 and 631,000 children are born in the U.S. each year with blood mercury levels high enough to impair performance on neurodevelopmental tests and cause lifelong loss of intelligence.

When conservatives who supposedly want to protect unborn children stop clamoring for more coal-fired power plants in Iowa, I'll take them more seriously.

You don't have to believe in global warming to recognize the dangers of relying on coal and the benefits of moving toward cleaner ways to generate electricity.  

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Well put (3.00 / 2)
especially on "pro - life" conservatives who support coal.

I wasn't surprised to see that Harkin and Brown (two of my political heroes) signed the letter, but it's still disappointing.

It looks like we still have a quite a ways to go on strengthening the Blue Green Alliance.  This is yet another reason why we need a massive investment in creating good jobs with good wages.  Rampant economic insecurity makes selling the necessary reduction in the use of dirty energy much more difficult.



Colbert Nation Gulf of America Fund


Excellent, excellent observation of yours (3.00 / 2)
When conservatives who supposedly want to protect unborn children stop clamoring for more coal-fired power plants in Iowa, I'll take them more seriously.

I hope that folks such as Ed Schulz, Jon Stewart, Rachel Maddow, etc. will drive that point home. The Republicans are are messy, hypocritical thinkers and all over the place.

Abstinence programs breed hypocrites.


Republicans reject Chemical plant security (3.00 / 3)
and want to put us at risk for terrorism.

Abstinence programs breed hypocrites.

That was a great piece by Jason Hancock (0.00 / 0)
thanks for the diary.  Now I have Kathy Mattea songs in my head...

Front Page Feed:
Menu
New here?
Make a New Account

Have an account?
Log in:

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


A stirring tale of how progressives built America and lessons on creating the next Big Change Moment, from OpenLeft's Mike Lux.

"As inspiring as it is informative." -Arianna Huffington

"Mike is that rarest breed: a populist insider." -Wes Boyd

"Better than an OpenLeft flame war." -Chris Bowers

Search




Advanced Search
Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Progressive Blue
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Since 02/29/2008
Powered by: SoapBlox