Home Page
Progressive News
Health Care & Wellness
Media & The Blogs
National Issues
Candidates & Causes
Poverty & Economics
Environment & Science
Education & Opportunity
Equality Rights & Issues
International Issues
Rants & Raves

About us
Who We Are
Community Guidelines
Getting Started
Formatting Tips
FAQ
Contact Us


New Blogroll coming soon

Progressive Issues for "more and BETTER" Democrats
"Health care is a fundamental right." (Ted Kennedy, 8/26/08)
* * * * * * *

"Family Politics" and Gov. Dean

by: edgery

Wed Feb 18, 2009 at 11:37:11 AM EST


The title of this diary comes from today's report in The Hill by Alexander Bolton.  And reading the article just plain pisses me off.

Several senior Senate Democrats have intensified their push for Howard Dean to become the next secretary of Health and Human Services, but the effort has run into what Dean allies call Democratic "family politics."


edgery :: "Family Politics" and Gov. Dean
While those Democrats pushing for Dean (Senators Harkin (D-IA) and Leahy (D-VT) are happy to be identified, those opposing the Governor's nomination hide behind a cloak of anonimity.  What babies!
But conservative Senate Democrats are leery of Dean and privately question whether he would be able to work with centrists such as Sens. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) to pass far-reaching reform.

What a bunch of hooey!  Dean is himself a centrist in many ways and worked across the aisle repeatedly as a governor.  Moreover, these same "conservative Senate Democrats" are the very ones in the Democratic party who pose the greatest threat to significant health care reform as they are the ones most beholden to insurance companies, big pharma, etc.  They are the Clinton/MacAuliffe Democrats who came of age in the Senate during the "middle way" era of increased corporatism, lessening support for unions and the middle class, and acceptance of the conservative meme of "smaller government is better government."

Here's what The.Most.Successful.DNC.Chairman.In.Recent.History has going against him:  the pettiness of Rahm Emanuel and potentially David Plouffe.  The former is well-known, the latter I am taking from the article and can't speak to:

Dean clashed with powerful Democrats during his tenure as party head.

When he was chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Rahm Emanuel - now Obama's chief of staff - once stormed out of Dean's office after a heated argument over how to spend party funds.

[diarist note: This was after Emanuel as chair of the DCCC demanded that Dean spend more national party money in 2006 on Congressional races--Dean reportedly told him that it was the DCCC's job to fund resources for those races and the DNC's job to raise money and support the 2008 Presidential race.  Emanuel was also adamently opposed to Dean's "50 State Strategy" and wanted to focus in the more traditional way of aggregating resources for blue states and a select few challengers.  Guess whose strategy Obama ultimately mimiked and with which he won?]

Dean has rankled other prominent Democrats in the past. During his 2004 run for president, Dean squared off against former House Democratic leader Dick Gephardt (Mo.) in an epic mudslinging match during the Iowa presidential primary. One of Gephardt's top political strategists at the time was David Plouffe, who bounced back from that disappointing primary to manage Obama's successful 2008 run.

[diarist note: Plouffe may still resent Dean's effort against Gephardt, though he seemed quite willing to emulate it this past year.  Moreover, he took the essence of Dean's 2004 strategy and translated it directly in Obama's campaign with the advantage of newer and better understood technologies and the basic approach of ceding no state or region either to his Democratic opponents or the Republicans.  If he still harbors any ill-will toward Dean (and I have no knowledge of that at all so I leave it as a big "if"), then he should get over it.  Dean gave him the strategy to win for Obama while Gephardt frankly never had a prayer's chance in hell of taking the presidency, imo.]

As the media continues its ongoing effort to create a frame of early failure by latching onto the Republican message that Obama failed to exhibit "true" bipartisanship in the stimulus bill debate (again, bunch of hooey!), Burton ends the article with another quote from a nameless cowardly Blue Dog senator:

"I would question whether Dean would be able to reach across the aisle to work with Republicans," said one Democratic senator. "The debate over the stimulus shows that you're not going to be able to ram something as big as healthcare reform through without bipartisanship."

From start to finish, this article is a neatly packaged advancement of the failed concept (but still being advanced widely by the corporate media and Rethugs) that bipartisanship means doing what Republicans and their Democratic lackeys want, despite the fact that they didn't win the national election and that bipartisanship actually means working together to advance the national interest, not the parochial and corporate interests that got this country into this mess!!

</rant>

 

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
My first choice is Elizabeth Edwards (3.00 / 5)
but Howard Dean is my second choice.  And he's a more realistic choice over EE.  But I doubt even Dean will get it since our Washington DLC officials are all chickenshit fucktards. As long as the DLC continues to run the party, progressives will always be sidelined.

The function of man is to live, not to exist.
I shall not waste my days trying to prolong them.
I shall use my time.  Jack London


seriously, md, how do you really feel? '-D (3.00 / 6)
since Dean is my first choice, I just want to say why Elizabeth is not: she simply doesn't need the stress. She is a very important voice on these issues, and I hope she continues speaking out. That said, and it's probably not my place to say, I can't believe having to deal with idiot MoCs and corporate hooligans is the best use of her time these days.

And I'm not being sexist or patronizing. I'd say the same if everything else in her life (as we imagine it) were a-okay.  Some folks I see as being the voice of sanity pushing the government to do the right thing (EE) and some I see as being the government making sure the right thing gets done (HD).

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. MLK Jr  


[ Parent ]
Vermont leads the nation in terms of health care coverage (3.00 / 5)
America has 30-40 million people left behind in terms of medical health insurance. I want a no-patient-left-behind bill.

Dean is a moderate, actually, and a next-door neighbor to Snowe and Collins.

Dean was absolutely right about the 50-state strategy, and Emmanuel was wrong. Why are winners being punished and losers rewarded?  

Abstinence programs breed hypocrites.


I think your question is excellent (3.00 / 5)
Why are losers being rewarded for outdated, outmoded, obstructionist thinking?  It's as if the media and--if you live in the Washington bubble as I do--members of Congress have developed a huge hole in their memories.  The past 8 years were the accumulation of all the effort of the conservative movement over the past 30 years.  They had all 3 branches of government and accomplished zippo.  They had all these glorious theories of governing and economics and foreign policy; look what they accomplished.  Our government is virtually non-functioning in many areas, the economy is in shambles, our international reputation reached its lowest point since I don't know when, states are near bankruptcy, people are scared, uninsured, losing their jobs and homes.  The past 8 years demonstrated that for all their hot air, the Rethugs don't have a clue how to govern.  Why are they getting ANY airtime or column inches at all?

Who in the Democratic Party is going to stand up and start stating the obvious on all those Sunday yammer-jammer shows?

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. MLK Jr  


[ Parent ]
Great diary (3.00 / 5)
I am beginning to wonder if I am in the right "family" and would have to seriously consider a Progressive Party if one arose.

Photobucket



Let's consider a two-pronged approach (3.00 / 5)
Strengthen the Progressive and Populist Caucuses within the Party, and lay the groundwork for a Progressive Populist Party in the future.

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. MLK Jr  

[ Parent ]
Agreed (3.00 / 4)
I was speaking out of disgust. Sometimes you must ingore me....

Photobucket



[ Parent ]
NEVER! You speak too much truth to be ignored... (3.00 / 5)
and I suffer from serious over-seriousness at times. ;-D

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. MLK Jr  

[ Parent ]
This pisses me off, too (3.00 / 4)
and you enumerated it perfectly. What a bunch of chickenshit POS! What makes things worse is that somehow In Rahm Emanuel's head he thinks he's responsible for the 2006 takeover and for the gains this year as well. Give me a break and from your accurate retelling, he apparently is not aware of his responsibilities in the DCCC.

And David Plouffe does need to get over it if he holds a grudge, because Gephart never had a chance. Not to mention Gephart practically co-wrote one of the first AUMF as well as voting for Bush's tax cuts saying, "We need to take this one step at a time" as a reason. Not saying he didn't support some good issues like fair trade, but he wasn't a good campaigner and it was apparent that he resented Dean for bringing the much needed fire sucked out of the Democratic party in 2004 by Dick Gephardt along with former DNC chair McAuliffe and the defeated in 2004 Tom Daschle. They helped generate the failure of the 2000 presidential election cycle, the disaster of the 2002 midterm election cycle, and the 2004 presidential election cycle.

They say emulation is the most sincere from of flattery and David Plouffe should give credit where credit is due and don't forget Joe Trippi as well as Dean. Obama is known as Dean 2.0 for good reason and that is why he won along with the 50 state strategy which better not be abandoned if we want to stay relevant.

I also respect Dean for putting up with their stupid BS for so long while implementing the 50 state strategy and telling Rahm to get lost and raise his own money. I only wish our president elect could have done the same.

Great rant and diary. I love rants.




Front Page Feed:
Menu
New here?
Make a New Account

Have an account?
Log in:

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


A stirring tale of how progressives built America and lessons on creating the next Big Change Moment, from OpenLeft's Mike Lux.

"As inspiring as it is informative." -Arianna Huffington

"Mike is that rarest breed: a populist insider." -Wes Boyd

"Better than an OpenLeft flame war." -Chris Bowers

Search




Advanced Search
Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Progressive Blue
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Since 02/29/2008
Powered by: SoapBlox